The addition of the Rossini clock brings about a dramatic uplift to the sound (literally) with overall focus and instrument separation /depth improved while the sound stage in my case literally lifted upwards on my speaker with more treble detail becoming apparent and the bass less diffuse. Ethernet input is more coherent and in my view more authentic to reality than USB - however USB when sent via a Innuos Pheonix re-clocker can render more micro detail, air, decay and apparent speed but overall is less focussed. 6V out is more dynamic (faster transients) and musical than 2v - if your system is compatible? I much prefer using the Bartok with a pre-amp - especially for low level listening. To concur with many others on this forum, I find that: Notable contributors from whom I have gained real insight include Pale Rider, Ermos, PAR and all2ofme - many thanks for your time. I have enjoyed many of the entries in the community over the last few months since getting into DCS. *The ethernet isolator does not have an audible impact when added or removed from the server input. The whole system (except for the hub/router which is on the main house mains ring) is served from a dedicated 16A supply with noise filtering. ![]() The ethernet cable run from the Innuos server to the Bartok is 1m of CAT 6 (unshielded). ![]() I use a Innuos Zenith MKIII server directly connected to my highspeed fibre optic connected hub/router via network isolator (EMOSAFE EN-1005+)* which aside from protecting from voltage surges also serves as galvanic isolation from the upstream connections. I own a Bartok (without headphone amp) and combine this with a Rossini clock.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |